Two New York residents were sentenced for selling and conspiring to transfer false identification documents on the darknet marketplaces AlphaBay Market and Dream Market. According to court documents, from at least from May 2015 until October 2017, defendants Andrea Alessandrini and Evan Hayes sold New York state driver’s licenses, fraudulent identity information for individuals (including fake social security numbers and birthdates), credit card holograms, and ATM skimmers on the darknet, all in exchange for cryptocurrency.
Yesterday, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California sentenced Evan Hayes, 28, of Buffalo, New York, to 18 months in prison, and on April 5, 2021, Alessandrini, 34, of Italy, was sentenced to 20 months in prison, for their roles in the charged identity fraud conspiracy. Alessandrini and Hayes pleaded guilty to the offenses on Nov. 16, 2020, and July 12, 2021, respectively.
According to court filings and statements made in connection with the defendants’ guilty pleas, Alessandrini created and operated the vendor account PlasticA on numerous darknet marketplaces, including AlphaBay Market and Dream Market. With his business partner, Hayes, Alessandrini sold over 300 fraudulent New York identity cards, four social security cards, 15 false birth certificates, 28 state identity card holograms, one ATM skimmer, and 410 “farmed” (i.e., stolen or fraudulently produced) identity packages to buyers in the Eastern District of California and elsewhere. Alessandrini operated the primary darknet accounts used to make these sales, while Hayes produced and mailed most of the fraudulent documents sold. On AlphaBay alone, Alessandrini and Hayes conducted between $250,000 and $400,000’s worth of transactions between May 2015 and October 2017.
In connection with the case, the United States seized evidence concerning the wide range of fraudulent identity documents created and sold to buyers throughout the United States, evidence which has been shared with a range of law enforcement agencies for use in additional investigations. Finally, the United States forfeited the proceeds of the offense conduct, which included approximately $134,881 in U.S. currency, 14.78 Bitcoins, 285 ounces of silver, four ounces of gold, and 22 prepaid Visa gift cards.
Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Polite Jr. of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney Phillip A. Talbert for the Eastern District of California made the announcement.
The FBI and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service investigated the case.
Senior Counsel Louisa K. Marion of the Criminal Division’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Hemesath for the Eastern District of California prosecuted the case.
- Justice Department Awards Nearly $104 Million to Help Crime Victims in Indian Country
November 15, 2021The Office for Victims of Crime (OVC), a component of the Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs (OJP), has awarded nearly $104 million to serve victims in tribal communities, of which nearly $101 million was awarded through the Crime Victims Fund Tribal Victim Services Set-Aside.
- Engineering Firm And Its Former Executive Indicted On Antitrust And Fraud Charges
October 23, 2020A federal grand jury in Raleigh, North Carolina returned an indictment charging Contech Engineered Solutions LLC and Brent Brewbaker, a former executive at the company, for participating in long-standing conspiracies to rig bids and defraud the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NC DOT), the Department of Justice announced.
- Department of Justice and Partner Departments and Agencies Conduct Coordinated Actions to Disrupt and Deter Iranian Malicious Cyber Activities Targeting the United States and the Broader International Community
September 17, 2020Unsealing of [Read More…]
- Briefing with Deputy Assistant Secretary for Passport Services Rachel Arndt, Bureau of Consular Affairs On the State Department’s Passport Services
July 14, 2021Rachel Arndt, Deputy [Read More…]
- Under Secretary Nuland’s Travel to South Africa, Botswana, Tanzania, and Niger
August 1, 2021Office of the [Read More…]
- Statement by Acting Attorney General Monty Wilkinson on the Pakistani Supreme Court’s Ruling Relating to the Abduction and Murder of Daniel Pearl
January 28, 2021Acting Attorney General Monty Wilkinson has released the following statement:
- Workforce Diversity: Analysis of Federal Data Shows Hispanics Are Underrepresented in the Media Industry
September 21, 2021What GAO Found Hispanics are underrepresented in the media industry compared to their representation in the rest of the workforce, according to GAO’s analysis of American Community Survey (ACS) data from the U.S. Census Bureau. In 2019, the most recent year data were available, Hispanics made up an estimated 12 percent of workers in the media industry, which includes film, television, publishing, and news, compared to an estimated 18 percent of workers in the rest of the workforce, which includes all other industries combined. Hispanic representation remained at an estimated 11 to 12 percent of the media industry workforce from 2014-2019, according to GAO’s analysis of ACS data. The estimated percentage of Hispanic workers varied by media sector. In 2019, the estimated percentage of Hispanic workers ranged from 8 percent in the publishing subsector to 16 percent for the film and video industry subsector. Hispanic representation also varied by occupation. We analyzed ACS data on the race/ethnicity of workers in 13 media occupations and found, on average, about 11 percent of these workers were Hispanic. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) data for 2018, the most recent year data were available, provide a different breakout of occupations that further inform the racial and ethnic makeup of the media industry. According to Employer Information Reports (EEO-1) submitted by media companies to the EEOC, service worker positions—food service, cleaning service, personal service, and protective service—had the highest percentage of Hispanic workers (22 percent). Eight percent of professional positions in the media industry were held by Hispanics. Hispanics were least likely to work in first- and mid-level management positions (7 percent) and in senior/executive management positions (4 percent), according to media companies’ reports to EEOC. Why GAO Did This Study The media industry plays an important role in educating and entertaining the public, but some have questioned the industry’s commitment to workforce diversity, including for Hispanic workers. The U.S. Census Bureau collects employment and race/ethnicity information from individuals living in the U.S. EEOC collects data from employers on the race/ethnicity of their workers and which positions they hold. GAO was asked to review representation of Hispanics in the media industry, including in the film, television, and publishing industries. This report examines representation of Hispanics in the media industry and in specific media occupations. GAO analyzed workforce data, including the Census Bureau’s annual American Community Survey data for 2014-2019 and EEOC annual Employer Information Reports for 2014-2018, the latest data available during GAO’s review. For more information, contact Dawn Locke at (202) 512-7215 or email@example.com.
- Joint Statement on Rocket Attacks in Erbil
February 17, 2021Office of the [Read More…]
- Steel and Aluminum Tariffs: Commerce Should Update Public Guidance to Reflect Changes in the Exclusion Process
December 13, 2021What GAO Found In 2020, Commerce made numerous changes to its procedures for deciding requests for relief, or exclusion, from steel and aluminum tariffs. For instance, the agency established general tariff exclusion for certain products, so that some importers no longer have to apply for case-by-case approval. However, Commerce’s public guidance does not reflect the changes because it has not been updated since June 2019, and the agency has no process to review and update its guidance as needed. For example, the guidance does not state that domestic producers who object to a tariff exclusion request may have more time than previously allowed to supply comparable products. Without regularly updated public guidance, importers and producers may not be informed of important details about the process, which could lead to challenges and delays for eligible requesters and potential objectors. Commerce has rejected a lower percentage of exclusion requests for containing errors since launching its Exclusion Portal website in June 2019: 10 percent of requests compared with 18 percent of requests submitted to Regulations.gov. Rejected requests typically include incorrect or incomplete information. Nevertheless, more than 22,000 requests submitted to the Exclusion Portal have been rejected for such errors, which means importers must submit new requests and wait longer for relief. Commerce stated that it plans to further reduce the rejection rate by adding features to the Exclusion Portal to prevent these errors. Commerce has improved its timeliness since the introduction of the Exclusion Portal. More than 80 percent of all requests are now decided within its timeliness guidelines, and the agency reduced its backlog of undecided requests. However, many requests that received objections are still not decided within those guidelines, as shown in the figure. Also, Commerce’s public guidance does not reflect the time it takes Commerce to decide many requests. Although Commerce states in its public user guide that most requests will be decided within 90 days, Commerce on average took 143 days to decide requests with objections. Requests without objections were decided in about 45 days, half of the publicly posted time frame. Commerce has not assessed and updated its guidance concerning timeliness since 2019. As a result, the public lacks accurate information about how long Commerce takes to make a decision, increasing business uncertainty for those submitting and objecting to requests. Department of Commerce Decisions on Tariff Exclusion Requests, with and without Objections, That Met Its Established Timeliness Guidelines as of June 2021 Why GAO Did This Study Citing national security concerns over excess global supply of steel and aluminum, in March 2018 the President placed tariffs on the import of some products under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Commerce established a process to provide relief, or exclusion, from the tariffs for importers of eligible products. Commerce originally accepted exclusion requests through the website Regulations.gov, but in June 2019 launched a custom-built website, the Exclusion Portal, for these requests. GAO was asked to review Commerce’s Section 232 tariff exclusion process, and previously reported on exclusion requests submitted to Regulations.gov in GAO-20-517. This current report examines the process since the launch of the Exclusion Portal; specifically: (1) changes to the procedures Commerce uses to decide tariff exclusion requests, and the guidance it provides; (2) the extent to which Commerce rejects requests because of errors; and (3) the timeliness of its decisions. GAO analyzed records from March 2018 to June 2021 from Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security and International Trade Administration, and interviewed agency officials.
- Presidential Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice Releases Final Report
December 22, 2020Today, following months of virtual meetings, testimony and study, U.S. Attorney General William P. Barr submitted the final report of the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice to the White House. This report represents the first comprehensive study of law enforcement in more than 55 years.
- Antarctica Travel Advisory
March 24, 2022Do not travel to [Read More…]
- Justice Department Sues to Shut Down Multistate Tax ‘Elimination’ Scheme Involving Charitable Remainder Annuity Trusts
February 24, 2022On Feb. 23, the United States filed a complaint seeking an order prohibiting John Hugo Eickhoff Jr., Rhonda Kaye Eickhoff, Hoffmann Associates LLC, Aric Elliot Schreiner, Columbia CPA Group LLC, John Williams Gray II and Damon Thomas Eisma from organizing, promoting or selling an allegedly unlawful tax scheme involving the use of charitable remainder annuity trusts (CRATs). The government allegations detail the defendants’ involvement with at least 70 CRATs, in a scheme that has resulted in an estimated $40 million of taxable income going unreported and at least $8 million in tax revenue losses.
- 2020 Census: Bureau Released Apportionment and Redistricting Data, but Needs to Finalize Plans for Future Data Products
March 14, 2022What GAO Found This report is the sixth in a series of updates on the Census Bureau’s (Bureau) 2020 Census activities and operations. This update includes information related to census operations since our December 2020 report, such as the release of two key data products, plans for protecting the confidentiality of respondent data, and the status and progress of remaining operations for assessing the quality of the data. Since GAO’s last update in December 2020, the Bureau has completed data processing for two key data products. Apportionment population counts, which are used to distribute the 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives among the states, were released on April 26, 2021. Redistricting data, which include the local area counts states need to redraw legislative boundaries, were released on August 12, 2021. The Bureau is required by law to protect respondent confidentiality. To that end, the Bureau implemented a new disclosure avoidance method in its 2020 Census redistricting data. However, the Bureau’s schedule to protect respondent privacy in future data products does not provide specific dates for the disclosure avoidance activities the Bureau intends to complete. The success of a program depends in part on having a reliable schedule that defines when work will occur. Without a specific and complete schedule, the Bureau may be unable to accurately plan for and track progress on disclosure avoidance steps for future data products. Remaining operations to assess census data quality include the independent post-enumeration survey (PES). The PES is conducted for a sample of the population to estimate how many people and housing units were missed or erroneously counted in the census (i.e., counted more than once, such as students who are counted at college and at their respective home addresses). The PES also produces undercounts and overcounts of the population by demographic characteristics. However, the PES has experienced challenges due to the pandemic. For example, the Bureau stated that PES schedule delays may decrease respondents’ ability to recall where they were living on Census Day because it occurred more than a year prior to the PES. Bureau officials have taken steps to mitigate risks such as adding the year 2020 for PES data collection as a point of reference. Bureau officials said they will be transparent about the survey data’s limitations. The Bureau reported that 2020 PES results will be released later than planned. National and state estimates of people undercounted or overcounted were expected in June 2021 and October 2021, respectively. However, Bureau officials released the national estimates of person coverage on March 10, 2022, and state estimates are expected to be released by June 30, 2022. Why GAO Did This Study In response to the COVID-19 national emergency, the Bureau made major and unprecedented adjustments to its plans for the 2020 Census. Operational delays led to the delayed release of the apportionment numbers and redistricting data products. The Bureau is evaluating the effect these adjustments had on the quality of the data collected. In recent years, GAO has identified challenges to the Bureau’s ability to conduct a cost-effective count, including new innovations and acquisition and development of IT systems. In 2017, these challenges led GAO to place the 2020 Census on its High-Risk List. GAO was asked to provide regular updates on the 2020 Census. This report focuses on the Bureau’s plans for protecting the privacy of respondent data, and its post-data collection activities to assess data quality. To describe the Bureau’s plans for protecting the privacy of respondent data for the 2020 Census, and its post-data collection activities we reviewed documentation on the status and plans for disclosure avoidance activities and for selected operations relevant to assessing data quality.
- New Caledonia Travel Advisory
March 24, 2022Do not travel to New [Read More…]
- Louisiana Man Indicted for Attempted Murder of a Gay Man and Plot to Kidnap and Murder Other Gay Men
March 18, 2021A Louisiana man was indicted and charged today in federal court in the Western District of Louisiana on six counts, including hate crime, kidnapping, firearm and obstruction charges.
- Department Press Briefing – September 24, 2021
September 26, 2021Ned Price, Department [Read More…]
- Cuba Travel Advisory
March 24, 2022Reconsider travel to [Read More…]
- Three Texas Men Sentenced to Prison for Using Dating App to Target Gay Men for Violent Crimes
June 24, 2021Three Texas men were sentenced yesterday for violent crimes.
- Swiss Confederation National Day
August 1, 2021Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
- Namibia Travel Advisory
September 26, 2020Do not travel to Namibia [Read More…]