What GAO Found
For the 2021 reporting period, most lobbyists provided documentation for key elements of their disclosure reports to demonstrate compliance with the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as amended (LDA). For lobbying disclosure (LD-2) reports and political contribution (LD-203) reports filed during the third and fourth quarters of 2020 and the first and second quarters of 2021, GAO estimates that
- 92 percent of lobbyists who filed new registrations also filed LD-2 reports as required for the quarter in which they first registered (the figure below describes the typical filing process and enforcement);
- 97 percent of all lobbyists who filed provided documentation for lobbying income and expenses;
- 35 percent of all LD-2 reports may not have properly disclosed one or more previously held covered positions as required; and
- 7 percent of LD-203 reports were missing reportable contributions.
These findings are generally consistent with GAO’s findings since 2012. Under the Justice Against Corruption on K Street Act of 2018, lobbyists are required to report certain criminal convictions. Of the 245 individual lobbyists in GAO’s sample none reported any such convictions. After conducting extensive background and website searches to determine the accuracy of the information reported, GAO could not positively identify one lobbyist due to that person’s common name.
Typical Lobbying Disclosure Process Typical Lobbying Disclosure Process
GAO found that most lobbyists in a sample of 99 reported some level of ease in complying with disclosure requirements and in understanding the definitions of terms used in the reporting. However, some disclosure reports demonstrate compliance difficulties, such as not properly disclosing covered positions or misreporting of income or expenses.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia (USAO) continued its efforts to resolve noncompliance by having lobbyists file their reports, terminate their registrations, or by pursuing civil and criminal penalties. USAO received 3,473 referrals from both the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House for failure to comply with reporting requirements cumulatively for years 2012 through 2021. Of the 3,473 referrals, about 28 percent were compliant and about 72 percent were pending further action, as of February 2022. Less than one percent did not require action or were suspended because the lobbyist or client was no longer in business or the individual lobbyist was deceased.
Why GAO Did This Study
The LDA, as amended, requires lobbyists to file quarterly disclosure reports and semiannual reports on certain political contributions. The law also includes a provision for GAO to annually audit lobbyists’ compliance with the LDA.
This report, among other things, (1) determines the extent to which lobbyists can demonstrate compliance with disclosure requirements, (2) identifies challenges or potential improvements to compliance that lobbyists report, and (3) describes the efforts of USAO in enforcing LDA compliance. This is GAO’s 15th annual report under the provision.
GAO reviewed a stratified random sample of 98 quarterly disclosure LD-2 reports filed for the third and fourth quarters of calendar year 2020 and the first and second quarters of calendar year 2021. GAO also reviewed two random samples totaling 160 LD-203 reports from year-end 2020 and midyear 2021.
This methodology allowed GAO to generalize to the population of 55,084 disclosure reports with $5,000 or more in lobbying activity and 28,851 reports of federal political campaign contributions. GAO also interviewed USAO officials.
GAO provided a draft of this report to the Department of Justice for review. The Department of Justice did not have comments.
For more information, contact Yvonne D. Jones at (202) 512-6806 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Former Ambulance Service Owner Charged with Tax Fraud
November 5, 2021A Virginia man was arraigned today on an indictment charging tax fraud that was returned by a federal grand jury in Roanoke, Virginia, on Aug. 20, 2020. He was arrested upon entry into the United States after residing overseas for more than a year.
- Grady County, Oklahoma Jail Officer Pleads Guilty to Using Excessive Force
January 19, 2022Johnnie Drewery, 27, a former Sergeant with the Grady County Jail, in Chickasha, Oklahoma, pleaded guilty today to using unreasonable force against an inmate, thereby violating the inmate’s constitutional civil rights.
- Higher Education: Department of Education Should Further Assess College Access Grant Programs
January 19, 2021Why This Matters The Department of Education gives grants to schools and organizations that provide disadvantaged students with services to help them attend college. These eight grant programs are collectively known as “TRIO”, named for the original three programs. Congress provides over $1 billion each year to these programs, but Education could do more to understand how well these grants work to help students. Key Takeaways Education could improve the information it has about TRIO programs in two areas: (1) grantee performance data, and (2) program assessments. Schools and organizations report data to Education to show how the TRIO grants they receive have been working. For example, organizations that receive grants to encourage students to complete college report on the numbers and percentages of students who received services and earned degrees. Education evaluates grantees’ performance using the self-reported data, but has done little to verify the data. Accurate performance data are important because returning grantees can earn points for past performance in the next grant competition—increasing the likelihood that they will receive new grants. Almost 80 percent of recent TRIO grants went to returning grantees. Therefore, grantees may have an incentive to report a more positive picture than warranted. Officials from an organization representing TRIO grantees told us there is a risk that some grantees may report inaccurate information. As for assessing the individual TRIO programs, studies of some programs are outdated. In addition, Education has never assessed the effectiveness of three of the seven TRIO programs that serve students, and did not have any new assessments planned as of August 2020. How GAO Did This Study We analyzed data from Education about TRIO grantees and applicants. We also reviewed relevant federal laws and regulations and agency documents, and interviewed Education officials and other TRIO stakeholders. Education should take additional steps to ensure the reliability of grantees’ performance data and develop a plan for assessing the effectiveness of the TRIO programs that serve students. Education generally agreed with our recommendations. For more information, contact Melissa Emrey-Arras at (617) 788-0534 or email@example.com.
- Counselor of the U.S. Department of State Chollet and Special Envoy Norland’s Visit to Libya
September 15, 2021
- Poland’s Troubling Legislation
August 13, 2021Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
- Seattle Doctor Found Guilty of Fraudulently Obtaining Millions of Dollars from COVID-19 Relief Programs
November 19, 2021A federal jury convicted a Seattle doctor yesterday of fraudulently seeking over $3.5 million and obtaining over $2.8 million in Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) COVID-19 relief funds.
- Justice Department Awards More Than $40 Million to Improve Services for Crime Victims
December 23, 2021The Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs (OJP) today announced grant awards totaling over $40 million to enhance services for victims of crime across the United States. The grants build on more than $1.2 billion in funding announced in September to support victim assistance and victim compensation programs administered by states and territories.
- Readout of Attorney General Merrick B. Garland’s Call with Bill Blair, Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness of Canada
May 19, 2021Attorney General Merrick B. Garland spoke yesterday with Bill Blair, the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness of Canada. In their inaugural bilateral conversation, the leaders discussed their shared commitment to cooperating at the strategic level on a wide range of shared challenges and opportunities – from advancing policing and justice reform to countering the threats posed by domestic violent extremism.
- Additions of Cuban Military-Owned Companies to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List
December 21, 2020Michael R. Pompeo, [Read More…]
- U.S.-ROK-Japan Trilateral Meeting on Shared North Korea-Related Challenges
February 19, 2021
- Appointment of Ambassador Philip Reeker as Chargé d’Affaires at Embassy London
July 15, 2021
- Secretary Blinken’s Participation in the Virtual NATO Foreign Ministerial
June 1, 2021
- Security Force Assistance: U.S. Advising of Afghan National Army Has Expanded since 2015, and the U.S. Army Has Deployed a New Advising Unit
August 24, 2021What GAO Found The Department of Defense (DOD) has used a variety of approaches to provide advisors in Afghanistan. For example, the United States has often relied on individual personnel drawn from across the military services to advise Afghan security forces. In 2012, the Army began pulling senior leaders and other personnel with specific ranks and skills from active-duty brigades to form advisor teams. In October 2016, the U.S. Army approved the development of a new force structure to use in advising foreign security forces–the Security Force Assistance Brigade (SFAB). GAO found that the U.S. advising approach for the Afghan National Army (ANA) under the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) mission to train, advise, and assist Afghan security forces–known as Resolute Support–has evolved since 2015 from advising the ANA primarily at the corps level, ministries, and institutions to include tactical-level advising with the ability to accompany the ANA on combat operations with certain limitations. This evolution of the advising approach since 2015 has included three key changes over time: 1. A geographic expansion of advising, and adjustment to originally planned force reductions. 2. Expansion of expeditionary advising and a related increase of U.S. forces. 3. A shift in strategy to allow U.S. forces to accompany and enable ANA tactical units. To support this expanded mission, the military services provided advisors and other personnel, with the Army providing the largest increases. For example, the U.S. Air Force continued to provide advisors from the ministerial down to the tactical level, and the U.S. Marine Corps returned to an advising role in Afghanistan in April 2017, from which it had previously departed in late 2014. The U.S. Army also provided additional personnel as part of an increase in forces approved in 2017, and in early 2018 deployed the first of its new Security Force Assistance Brigades–the 1st SFAB–as part of the over 1,700 Army personnel provided during the year to bolster the advisory mission. DOD’s decision to deploy the 1st SFAB resulted in an acceleration of the new unit’s planned deployment timelines by at least 8 months, which, combined with other decisions, resulted in several challenges. These challenges included issues related to manning and training the SFAB and providing sufficient enabling forces to support the SFAB’s mission in Afghanistan. According to Army officials, the Army is collecting lessons learned from experiences manning, training, and deploying the 1st SFAB to inform the continued development and institutionalization of the SFAB. Why GAO Did This Study Senate Report 115-125 included a provision for GAO to review U.S. advising efforts. This report describes (1) the evolution of the U.S. approach for advising in Afghanistan under Resolute Support, and (2) actions the U.S. military services have taken and plan to take to meet the additional advisor requirements for Afghanistan, and any challenges they may be experiencing. The scope of this work focuses on U.S. efforts to train, advise, and assist the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces under Resolute Support–particularly ANA conventional ground forces. GAO reviewed and analyzed military plans, guidance, and other documents; interviewed officials from DOD and across the military services; and reviewed documentation and other information pertaining to the development, training, and deployment of the SFAB.
- Burma (Myanmar) Travel Advisory
March 24, 2022Do not travel to Burma [Read More…]
- Guyana National Day
May 26, 2021Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
- North Carolina Man Pleads Guilty to Promoting Nationwide Tax Fraud Scheme
January 4, 2022A North Carolina man pleaded guilty yesterday to conspiring to defraud the United States by promoting a nationwide tax fraud scheme and assisting in the preparation and filing of false tax returns for the scheme’s participants.
- Three Men Sentenced for $2.7 Million COVID-19 Relief Fraud Scheme
February 15, 2022Three men were sentenced yesterday in the Middle District of North Carolina for fraudulently seeking over $2.7 million in Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans and Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDLs) guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (SBA) under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act.
- Man Sentenced to 55 Months in Prison for Violating Sanctions Against Senior Venezuelan Leaders
March 17, 2021More from: March 17, 2021 [Read More…]
- Dark Web Child Pornography Facilitator Sentenced to 27 Years in Prison for Conspiracy to Advertise Child Pornography
September 16, 2021A dual national of the United States and Ireland was sentenced yesterday to 324 months, or 27 years, in federal prison followed by a lifetime of supervised release for conspiracy to advertise child pornography.
- [Request for Reconsideration of Protest of Navy Contract Award for Base Support Services]
September 17, 2021A firm requested reconsideration of its dismissed protest of the Navy’s decision to perform base operations and support services in-house rather than contract for these services, contending that the Navy’s proposed corrective action failed to address all of its concerns. GAO held that it would not consider these issues, since the Navy’s proposed corrective action may affect key requirements in the solicitation and render the protester’s concerns academic. Accordingly, the request for reconsideration was denied.