Office of the Spokesperson
MODERATOR: Thank you, Ryan, and thank you, everyone, for joining us this afternoon for this briefing on the U.S. humanitarian assistance response to Russia’s further invasion of Ukraine.
Here at the top, before we get started, I would like to remind everyone that this briefing is on background with attribution to senior administration officials, and that the contents of this call are embargoed until the end of the briefing.
For the purposes of your reporting, you can refer to our briefers as Senior Administration Official Number One, Senior Administration Official Number Two, and Senior Administration Official Number Three.
Now, for your information but not for your reporting, I’m going to go ahead and let you know who our briefers are this afternoon. I’m very glad to have with us ; be Senior Administration Official Number One. ; be Senior Administration Official Number Two. And third, , or Senior Administration Official Number Three.
Okay, we’re going to start our briefing today just with some brief remarks from each of our speakers and then we’ll take a few of your questions. Again, let me just say that this briefing this afternoon is on the U.S. humanitarian assistance in response to Russia’s further invasion of Ukraine. I would like to go ahead and ask folks to please limit your questions to that topic. We’ve already had excellent briefings today from Press Secretary Jen Psaki over at the White House and Spokesperson Ned Price here at State covering the full gamut of issues with regard to Russia and its invasion of Ukraine, so we’ll ask you again to limit your questions to humanitarian assistance and our response in that regard.
Okay. And with that, I’m going to go ahead and turn it over to to get us started. ?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL NUMBER ONE: Thank you and good afternoon, everyone. I appreciate the opportunity to speak with you today about USAID’s humanitarian response to the crisis in Ukraine following Russia’s unprovoked and unjustified invasion.
Since this senseless campaign of unprovoked violence has begun, 4.7 million people have been displaced in and out of Ukraine. That’s over 10 percent of Ukraine’s population, but one that the UN thinks the real figures may be significantly higher.
Putin’s war has turned nearly 3 million Ukrainians into refugees, including 1 million children, some of whom are forced to flee without their parents. Nearly 2 million people are displaced inside of Ukraine. We are hearing distressing reports from our partners in cities like Mariupol, where people remain in dire conditions and lack safe drinking water, food, fuel, and electricity. The extensive damage we are seeing also means that shelter may be inadequate at a time when people face cold weather. All of this is compounded by the terror of living under bombardment.
As the war continues into its third week, as just one of the many examples of the horrors civilians face, we are seeing Russian forces target schools and hospitals with a campaign of terror that has interrupted the cancer treatment for 1,500 children who are now forced to flee as bombs rain down on them while crossing into foreign countries with compromised immune systems during a pandemic with only the supplies they can carry.
We call for an immediate end to this needless war of aggression. Short of that, the United States strongly supports the United Nations’ call for the establishment of safe passage of civilians out of areas under Russian attack and safe passage for aid workers attempting to provide humanitarian and medical supplies. Russia must negotiate in good faith on these issues immediately.
In the face of this catastrophic toll on the people of Ukraine, you are seeing the U.S. stand united with our allies to aid those who are suffering. USAID’s Disaster Assistance Response Team, or DART, has been in the region since the early days of Russia’s unprovoked war, making up-to-the-minute assessments of humanitarian needs and quickly ramping up assistance in Ukraine.
Over the past week alone, USAID has rapidly deployed four planeloads of lifesaving supplies from our warehouse in Dubai and mobilized our partners to immediately stand up surge support.
This includes blankets, high energy biscuits, kitchen sets, water treatment supplies, which USAID partner International Organization for Migration, or IOM, will distribute to vulnerable Ukrainians.
We’ve also worked with our partner the World Health Organization to provide emergency health kits with vital medicines and medical supplies, as well as trauma and emergency surgery kits to support emergency surgeries. These supplies, which serve upwards of 100,000 people, are directly supporting the Government of Ukraine’s health care system, which has been badly damaged since the war began.
USAID partner the UN World Food Program also transported 500 metric tons of wheat flour, enough to provide bread for 500,000 people for a week, to Kyiv. A WFP-contracted bakery also delivered nearly 15 metric tons of bread – sent to meet the needs of 60,000 people – to hospitals in Kharkiv.
Through our partners, we also continue to provide critical psychosocial support to children, people with disabilities, and older people, operating mobile medical units and protection teams to reach remote, displaced, or homebound communities and conducting mine-risk education activities to minimize protection risk.
In total, the United States has provided nearly 293 million in additional humanitarian assistance in just the last two weeks, including nearly 81 million from USAID. We will continue to stand with the Ukrainian people during this crisis and work to meet their needs.
However, despite this project – progress, the situation on the ground in Ukraine is rapidly getting worse. Russian bombardment and shelling continues to damage the infrastructure needed to get aid to people, destroying roads, bridges, and railroads, and making it difficult for aid workers to reach people in need. In the absence of a ceasefire, humanitarian safe passage must be assured in order to allow aid workers to reach those in need. As humanitarian needs continue to rise, USAID is working closely with European allies and partners who are on the front lines of this response on how to support people displaced internally and other people affected by the conflict. We will continue to coordinate closely with the UN, other donors and partners to urge that robust humanitarian assistance can continue to prevent gaps in basic service delivery.
Thank you for your time. I’d now like to pass it to for remarks.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL TWO: Hi. Thank you, , and thank you everybody for being here this afternoon.
I’m from , and we really want to underscore that our partnership with and commitment to the people of Ukraine and their government is steadfast and enduring. We will continue to support and stand with them.
Today I want to share with you more about the enormous humanitarian efforts underway to assist the 12 million people in need of assistance across Ukraine, and the nearly 3 million refugees throughout neighboring countries due to the Russian Federation’s unprovoked and unjustified attack against Ukraine.
We are working with the Government of Ukraine, neighboring governments in the region, the European Union, international organizations like the United Nations, and other partners around the clock to address the urgent humanitarian needs of this crisis. We are closely coordinating with these partners to monitor developments, assess needs, and respond accordingly.
Historically, the United States is the largest single country donor of humanitarian assistance to Ukraine. Since the start of the current crisis, we have announced nearly $293 million in additional assistance to those affected by Russia’s further invasion of Ukraine, including more than 186 million announced today. This includes nearly 81 million from USAID, and nearly 212 million from the Department of State, and we will continue to do even more.
With this new contribution, we will complement the tremendous efforts of neighboring countries generously welcoming refugees. We will work through our international and nongovernmental partners who provide food, safe drinking water, shelter, emergency health care, and protection. This assistance will also support vulnerable populations inside Ukraine, as our humanitarian organization partners work tirelessly to provide safe passage for evacuees trying to leave danger.
Since the conflict in Ukraine began eight years ago, the United States has provided over 644 million in humanitarian assistance to vulnerable communities across Ukraine. We will continue to support our European allies and partners who are at the forefront of this response, as well as international organizations and nongovernmental organizations working to mitigate the humanitarian impacts of this crisis.
We are also committed to working with a range of partners and stakeholders, including the Ukrainian diaspora community, to ensure that humanitarian organizations are prepared to respond to existing and new needs that arise in Ukraine and the neighboring countries. The courage of the people of Ukraine and the generosity of all who have stepped up in their time of need is inspiring, and we will continue to stand with Ukraine.
Thank you, and I will turn it over to . Thank you.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL THREE: Thank you, . Good afternoon, everyone. I’m here representing to share information about visa processing for Ukrainians.
But first, just for a second, I want to go off – slightly off-topic and reiterate the State Department Travel Advisory for Ukraine is at a Level Four – Do Not Travel due to increased threat of Russian military action. Our recommendations to U.S. citizens currently in Ukraine is that they should leave now using available transportation options if it is safe to do so. We continue to encourage U.S. citizens in Ukraine to fill out our online form to let us know where they are, what they’re doing.
Turning to visas, given the suspension of our operations in Ukraine, the State Department is not offering visa services in Ukraine at this time. I’ll talk a little bit about immigrant visas first and then nonimmigrant visas. We want to share this information to further clarify visa options and outline alternatives to visas that Ukrainians may consider. It’s important to note that a visa is not a viable way to achieve refugee resettlement in the United States.
We understand that any U.S. citizens who leave Ukraine may have families with mixed immigration status, for example, a U.S. citizen whose spouse has not yet started or completed the immigrant visa process. We are prioritizing consular support to U.S. citizens and their immediate family members in this regard. The Immigration and Nationality Act defines immediate family members as spouse, unmarried children under 21, and parents, so that’s our focus for immigrant visas.
We have designated the U.S. Consulate General in Frankfurt as the processing post for all the immigrant visa applications that would have been processed in Kyiv, with the exception of adoption cases, which will be handled at the U.S. embassy in Warsaw.
Ukraine passport holders can enter Schengen countries without a visa. U.S. citizens and their immediate family members should relocate to a safe place and then follow detailed guidance on visa processing on our website and the website of the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate. U.S. citizens who are overseas with the immediate family members that I described and have not yet filed an immigrant visa petition with USCIS may request to file a petition at the nearest embassy or consulate that processes immigrant visas. Again, this only applies to the spouses, unmarried children under 21, and the parents that I just described. Individuals who already have a USCIS-approved current petition for an immigrant visa for their relatives of any kind who have not yet been scheduled for an immigrant visa interview may be able to request expedited processing through the National Visa Center.
Now turning to nonimmigrant visas, again, I want to reiterate that nonimmigrant visas are for temporary stays in the United States. They’re not the appropriate tool to begin an immigrant, refugee, or resettlement process. If a person applies for a B1/B2 visa, commonly called a tourist visa, but they are unable to demonstrate their intent to leave the United States after a defined period in order to return to a residence abroad, a consular officer will have to refuse the application. Nonimmigrant visa applicants may apply at any embassy or consulate where they are physically present and where appointments are available. A full list of embassies and consulates is available at usembassy.gov.
As a result of COVID – as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, applicants may face extended visa interview wait times at some embassies and consulates, but once an interview appointment is made, applicants will have the ability to request an expedited appointment. However, they must describe the unique circumstances that justify such a request, i.e. justify that they go get an appointment earlier than many of the other people in a similar situation.
Finally, a note on adoption. The department is actively working with adoption service providers to provide guidance and answer questions during this critical time. Our website address – addresses adoptions and intended adoptions at various stages of the process and provides guidance on whom to consult and clarifications on the department’s potential role and ability to assist. Prospective adoptive parents should consult their adoption service provider about how the crisis in Ukraine may impact their adoption plans. They can also email email@example.com with questions.
With that, I’ll turn it back to . Thank you.
MODERATOR: Great. Thank you to and and to for that. Operator, would you please give the instructions once again for getting into the question queue?
OPERATOR: Certainly. Ladies and gentlemen, if you’d like to ask a question, please press 1 then 0 now – 1, 0.
MODERATOR: Okay, let’s go to the line of Michelle Hackman.
OPERATOR: Okay. Please, go ahead. Your line is open.
QUESTION: Hi there, thanks for doing this call. I’m wondering if I guess someone from the refugee division can speak to there’s been some reporting about creating an expedited program for Ukrainian refugees to come to the U.S., particularly those with family members already here. Could you tell us what the latest thinking is about that?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL TWO: Sure, and I will echo or refer everybody back to Jen Psaki’s comments on this earlier today as well, but the department is continuing to work to explore all possible options to support those who may want to resettle to the United States and meet the qualifications of our resettlement program. We are recognizing, though, that most people who are fleeing Ukraine are – prefer to stay in the region where they can travel visa-free and many have families and there are large diaspora communities, with the hope that they can return home soon. And so we do want to commend our European allies for keeping their borders open and continuing to provide protection to those who are fleeing.
If refugees are identified as having protection needs that cannot be met in the country where they currently are – again, recognizing that their immediate safety is of paramount importance – we will work with our UN partners and other resettlement partners to identify those that would be safer resettling to other countries, including the United States, and then we’ll seek to help assist them through our U.S. Refugee Resettlement Program. That program is not an emergency response program, so again, our goal would be to provide humanitarian assistance to keep people safe where they are for now while that process would continue.
MODERATOR: And let’s please go to the line now of Camilla Schick.
OPERATOR: Okay. Please, go ahead. Your line is open.
QUESTION: Hi. Hi, thank you for this. I was wondering if you could give a little bit more detail – and I understand the security concerns in providing detail on this, but any more detail about what the U.S. or USAID is doing to help particularly Ukrainian journalists, anti-corruption activists, ethnic minorities, members of vulnerable communities such as LGBTQ who want to leave the country because of the Russian advance and whether – given that they’re Ukrainian, whether there is some kind of special status or visa application process for them to be able to come to the United States or elsewhere. Thank you.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL TWO: This is . I can start off on that and then let others chime in, but I would say – so first, our humanitarian organization partners are doing everything they can to continue to operate on the ground inside Ukraine to provide safe passage for evacuees trying to flee from the dangerous situation, including – particularly those who are most vulnerable, such as the groups that you have mentioned.
I – once refugees get to the border crossings, again, our international organization partners for whom we have now contributed a significant amount of resources in the past two weeks particularly focus on the protection of those groups that are most vulnerable and will seek to provide them with information at the border and where to go on the other side, and then again, our partners are on the other side of the border as well and will be providing protection to all of those who are most vulnerable, whether it be, again, dissidents, journalists, those who are LGBTQI+ individuals, those with disabilities, as well as third-country nationals who may be having challenges returning back to their home countries. So they are particularly attuned to those groups, and are focusing their protection efforts, including surging additional staff with explicit expertise at providing protection to vulnerable groups.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL THREE: And this is . On the very last part of that question regarding visas, the options for visa application are defined in statute. You mentioned journalists, you mentioned a couple other groups. As I had discussed in my remarks, the B1/B2 visa is just for general visits to the United States, business or tourism. There is a particular visa category for journalists who are coming to the US to work as journalists, called the I visa. Maybe you already – you guys may be very familiar. But apart from that, there are no – there’s a wide variety of visa categories, but I don’t believe any that would apply to the groups that you just noted. By far the vast majority of the nonimmigrant visa categories require a residence abroad and have a presumption of intending immigration that the applicant needs to rebut. But as I said, we are processing many emergency visa applications. We are not able to process the volume of the people who are thinking about that as an option.
I hope that answers your question. Over.
MODERATOR: Okay. And let’s go to the line of Erin Durkin.
QUESTION: Hi. Thank you so much for taking my question. I just have a two-part question on the use of humanitarian corridors, particularly by the USAID team on the ground. I first wanted to just ask a clarifying question – if and when these are established or agreed upon with Russia, if the focus of the USAID team is more about getting people out or if it’s also about getting supplies into the regions. And then the second part of that is how you will balance that with the safety of your own team given Russia’s particularly bad history with humanitarian corridors.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL ONE: Hi. Okay, thank you for that question. I’d first start by saying we – both USAID and the State Department work through and with nongovernmental and UN partners on the ground. Their safety and security is of the utmost importance to us, but this is not – these programs are not directly implemented by U.S. Government personnel. It is through our partners. Our focus is on both the evacuation of civilians who are seeking to leave these encircled cities, as well as getting critical food and medical supplies in along those same safe passages should they be negotiated by the parties to the conflict.
OPERATOR: And as a reminder, if you’d like to queue up for a question, it’s 1 then 0.
MODERATOR: And just on that last question, I would add that of course colleagues here, we want to do everything possible to save lives, which is why the U.S. Government, we of course support the establishment of humanitarian corridors. I would point out that there’s been I believe at this point six successive agreements for humanitarian pauses in fighting in Mariupol which have broken down. During one of those reported pauses on March 9th, a maternity hospital was targeted. These corridors will only be as effective as Moscow’s willingness to maintain them, and the corridors, while they would be welcome in the short term, are certainly no substitute for ending the war. And I know that the U.S. Government will continue to pull every lever to bring about that outcome.
Let’s go to the line of Abigail Williams. Abby.
QUESTION: Hi. Thanks so much for doing this call. A couple of questions. One of them, I wondered if you could just address sort of where you’re starting at here in this process where you are trying to help Ukrainians now after the system has been affected by COVID, by cuts in previous administrations, by processing the 70,000 Afghans that are being brought in recently, and how that impacts your ability to process visas now. And more specifically, I wondered what you would say to the Ukrainian American community here who obviously are very focused on their loved ones overseas trying to come over and may not be a direct family member, may not fit into that – the nuclear family category, maybe an adult sibling or something along those lines. And what would you say to them? How would you say they can help to bring their family over here, and how long would that process take? Thanks.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL THREE: Hi, yes. Many thanks for this question. So we – as you’ve been following, we have many – many, many things we need – we are doing with our limited resources. We are throwing many, many resources at the assistance for U.S. citizens in this region as well as visa processing, but the demand, as you can imagine, is very high, which is why we’re trying to educate the appropriateness of the immigrant visa and nonimmigrant visa channels so that the people who are using those pathways do so knowing what the requirements are.
With that respect, we are engaging with the Ukrainian diaspora. You’re exactly right, these are many of the questions. There are processes to bring other non-immediate relatives through the immigrant visa process. This might include your adult child of a U.S. citizen, it would include relatives of legal permanent residents, spouse and minor children chief among them. It would include your – even your siblings. This process is not immediate and it goes through U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service, after which we would process that application overseas. And some of the ones that we are processing in Frankfurt are those cases, it’s just we can’t process immediately sort of everything from the petition to the immigrant visa all as one package, only for those immediate relatives, spouse, minor children, and parents expeditiously.
Other than that, many people may very well qualify for a nonimmigrant visa, but it definitely depends on their situation. Again, the statute requires a residence abroad to which they have no intention of abandoning. It does not have to be their home in Ukraine. They have to have a plan for what they’re doing after – how does this trip to the United States fit in with their plans forward. Don’t – doesn’t have to be concrete; you have to rebut the presumption of intending immigration, that you have something else planned for after this trip of a defined period to the United States, which might make sense in some people’s cases, might not make sense depending on what their purpose of the travel is.
I want to emphasize each of those is a case-by-case analysis by the consular officer. They look at the totality of circumstances, and so it’s not a – that you can’t use this, it’s just if your plan is to go to the United States and you have absolutely no idea what you’ll do after that – which I have to say on a human level is very understandable – as U.S. consular officers who are charged with executing U.S. immigration law, they would be well advised to have much more of a plan afterward – I’ll be – going to go visit my aunts and come back to Poland where I’m enrolling in school, or Germany, or wherever. That’s all possible.
I hope that answers your question.
MODERATOR: Okay, one more time, if you have a question and would like to ask that question, please dial 1 and then 0.
Looks like we have a follow-up from Abby. Operator, would you please open up Abigail’s line again, please?
OPERATOR: Okay. Please, go ahead. Your line is open.
QUESTION: Sorry, since no one else is jumping in, I thought I might toss out another question. I recognize it’s difficult to give specific numbers, but I wondered if you might be able to say what the current backlog is in processing visas more broadly or speak to what that backlog looks like, or – and/or if you could give a little more specifics on what you’re seeing as far as applications for visas right now by Americans – by Ukrainians trying to come over to the U.S.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL THREE: I don’t have numbers for you at all on the backlog. We do – particularly, I assume you’re asking about nonimmigrant visas. Each post is different. I do want to emphasize, as I said at the top, we do have an expedite channel, so even if the wait time for a routine B1/B2 visa is lengthy, someone with exceptional circumstances – a medical or unique humanitarian need – can request an expedite. Thank you.
MODERATOR: Okay, great. With that, I’d like to thank our briefers today – , , and also . Again, thank you.
Once again, as a quick reminder, this call was on background today with attribution to senior administration officials. With that, we are concluding today’s conference call and the embargo is now lifted. Thank you.
- Spain National Day
October 12, 2020
- Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Israeli Alternate Prime Minister/Defense Minister Benjamin “Benny” Gantz Before Their Meeting
June 3, 2021Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
- D.C. Tax Return Preparer Sentenced to Prison for Preparing False Tax Return
December 17, 2020A D.C. tax return preparer was sentenced to 24 months in prison today following her guilty plea in February 2020 for aiding and assisting in the preparation of a false tax return, announced Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Richard E. Zuckerman of the Justice Department’s Tax Division.
- Presidential Task Force on Missing and Murdered American Indians and Alaska Natives Releases Status Report
December 10, 2020The Presidential Task Force on Missing and Murdered American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN) today released a status report detailing accomplishments during its first year and outlining its strategy for the next 12 months. The President’s Executive Order (E.O.) 13898, set forth a range of tasks to be completed over the two-year life of the Task Force, with required reports at the end of each year. Attorney General William P. Barr and Secretary of the Interior David L. Bernhardt transmitted the status report to President Trump, and notably characterized these accomplishments as, “a productive first year of Task Force operations.”
- Secretary Michael R. Pompeo At the Three Seas Virtual Summit and Web Forum
October 19, 2020
- Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa
April 23, 2021Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
- Two ISIS Members Charged with Material Support Violations
September 30, 2020Two United States citizens who were detained by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and recently transferred to the custody of the FBI have been charged with material support violations relating to their support for the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), a designated foreign terrorist organization.
- Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke Delivers Remarks Announcing a Civil Rights Investigation into Conditions in Texas Juvenile Facilities
October 13, 2021Good afternoon. My name is Kristen Clarke, Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Justice. I am joined by Ashley Hoff, United States Attorney for the Western District of Texas; Jennifer Lowery, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of Texas; Nicholas Ganjei, Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern Districts of Texas; and Chad Meacham, Acting United States Attorney for the Northern District of Texas.
- Bahrain National Day
December 16, 2020
- JPL Mission Breaks Record for Smallest Satellite to Detect an Exoplanet
September 26, 2020About the size of a [Read More…]
- Justice Department Settles with Construction Company to Resolve Immigration-Related Discrimination Claims
October 27, 2021The Department of Justice today announced that it has reached a settlement agreement with Priority Construction Corporation, located in Baltimore, Maryland.
- Individual Pleads Guilty to Participating in Internet-of-Things Cyberattack in 2016
December 9, 2020An individual, formerly a juvenile, pleaded guilty to committing acts of federal juvenile delinquency in relation to a cyberattack that caused massive disruption to the Internet in October 2016.
- Military Personnel: Perspectives on DOD’s and the Military Services’ Use of Borrowed Military Personnel
November 18, 2020Policies on the use of borrowed military personnel vary among military services. Borrowed military personnel refers to military personnel used for duties outside their assigned positions, such as security protection. DOD policy acknowledges that there may be instances in which military personnel can be used to appropriately satisfy a near-term demand but that DOD must be vigilant in ensuring that military personnel are not inappropriately utilized, particularly in a manner that may degrade readiness. Additionally, the Army and the Marine Corps have their own policies that describes how military personnel may be used on a temporary basis. DOD and the Army, Navy, and Air Force do not centrally track their use of borrowed military personnel, nor do they assess any impacts of that use on the readiness of units and personnel to accomplish their assigned missions. According to DOD and Army officials, the relatively limited use of borrowed military manpower, their limited impacts on readiness, and the existence of other readiness reporting mechanisms serve to obviate the need to collect and analyze this information centrally—especially given the resources that would be required to establish and maintain such a reporting process. The House Armed Services Committee has questioned whether DOD continues to divert servicemembers from their unit assignments to perform nonmilitary functions that could be performed by civilian employees. House Report 116-120, accompanying a bill for the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 included a provision for GAO to assess the levels and impacts of borrowed military personnel. This report examines DOD’s and the military services’ policies on the use of borrowed military personnel, the tracking and reporting of their use of borrowed military personnel, and any impacts of that use on readiness. For more information, contact Cary Russell at (202)512-5431 or RussellC@gao.gov.
- [Protests of Army Corps of Engineers Contract Award for Environmental Remediation Services]
August 18, 2021A firm protested an Army Corps of Engineers contract award for environmental remediation services, contending that the: (1) Corps’ evaluation of the bids was unreasonable and inconsistent with the solicitation’s evaluation criteria, making the selection decision flawed; and (2) Corps improperly failed to perform a cost-technical tradeoff analysis. GAO held that the: (1) Corps reasonably gave the awardee’s proposal an excellent technical rating in areas where the proposal met most of the criteria for an excellent rating; (2) protester untimely filed more than 10 days after it knew the basis of protest several issues raised in its supplemental protest; and (3) Corps’ consideration of price and technical factors in the selection decision was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation’s evaluation criteria. Accordingly, the protests were denied.
- COVID-19: Selected Agencies Overcame Technology Challenges to Support Telework but Need to Fully Assess Security Controls
September 30, 2021What GAO Found Each of the 12 agencies GAO selected for review had information technology (IT) in place to support remote access for telework during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the agencies initially experienced IT challenges in supporting remote access for maximum telework, they generally overcame them. For example, seven agencies were challenged in providing sufficient bandwidth to provide remote access for teleworkers, but they increased bandwidth as needed to ensure networks could handle additional remote connections. In addition, while the increased number of remote connections brings additional cybersecurity risks, all of the selected agencies reported that they continued activities intended to help ensure the security of their information and systems. While the selected agencies had documented elements of a telework security policy, such as permitted telework devices and forms of remote access, not all agencies had fully addressed other relevant federal guidance for securing their systems that support remote access for telework (see figure). Specifically, two agencies had not fully documented relevant IT security controls to protect those systems. In addition, assessments for systems that five agencies relied upon for remote access did not address all relevant controls to ensure the controls were operating effectively. Further, four selected agencies had not fully documented remedial actions to mitigate weaknesses they had previously identified. Extent to Which 12 Selected Agencies Followed Federal Information Security Guidance in Implementing Their IT Systems That Support Remote Access for Telework Although one of the selected agencies subsequently resolved its shortcomings, others had not. For the agencies that did not fully follow federal information security guidance, agency IT security officials stated that these conditions existed for various reasons, such as out-of-date documentation, among others. If agencies do not sufficiently document relevant security controls, assess the controls, and fully document remedial actions for weaknesses identified in security controls, they are at increased risk that vulnerabilities in their systems that provide remote access could be exploited. Why GAO Did This Study In response to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, in March 2020 the Office of Management and Budget directed federal agencies to maximize their use of telework to enable the workforce to remain safe while ensuring that government operations continue. Telework is essential to continuity of operations but also brings added cybersecurity risks. The CARES Act contains a provision for GAO to monitor the federal response to the pandemic. GAO was also asked to examine federal agencies’ preparedness to support expanded telework. GAO’s objectives were to determine (1) selected agencies’ initial experiences in providing the IT needed to support remote access for maximum telework and (2) the extent to which selected agencies followed federal information security guidance for their IT systems that provide remote access. GAO selected 12 agencies for review that varied in their percentages of reported employee telework use and sent a questionnaire to solicit these agencies’ perspectives on the use of IT in transitioning to maximum telework. GAO also reviewed the selected agencies’ information security documentation and interviewed relevant officials.
- South Africa Travel Advisory
September 26, 2020Reconsider travel to [Read More…]
- Federal Protective Service: Better Documented Cost Estimates Could Help Stakeholders Make Security Decisions
June 9, 2021What GAO Found The Federal Protective Service (FPS) provides security and protection at more than 9,000 federal facilities. FPS performs a variety of security activities in conjunction with the General Services Administration (GSA), which functions as the landlord at most of these facilities, and with the federal agencies, which occupy these facilities as tenants. These stakeholders can provide important perspectives on FPS’s performance of its key activities (see figure). The Federal Protective Service’s Three Key Security Activities Stakeholders expressed satisfaction with many aspects of FPS’s performance of key activities but also identified aspects where they thought FPS could make improvements. For example, stakeholders expressed satisfaction with the professionalism of FPS personnel and commended FPS’s coordination in responding to law enforcement incidents. However, some stakeholders said they would like to see FPS oversee contract guards more often. In addition, many stakeholders said that FPS could improve the cost estimates in its security assessment reports. GAO’s review of FPS’s Facility Security Assessment reports found that cost estimates for the recommended security measures lacked information that could help stakeholders make decisions to accept or reject FPS’s recommendations. Specifically, recent reports for 27 selected buildings did not document (1) the assumptions FPS made to produce the cost estimates (e.g., the scope of work) and (2) the sources FPS used to create the estimate. In one report, for example, FPS recommended additional fencing and provided a cost estimate with an exact dollar amount. However, FPS did not document the assumptions it used to develop the estimate, such as the height and linear feet of fence or the fencing material. According to GAO’s Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide , cost estimates should provide information about the assumptions and sources used to develop an estimate so that decision-makers can understand the level of uncertainty around the estimate. By providing detailed information about the cost estimates in Facility Security Assessment reports, FPS could better inform stakeholders and potentially increase implementation of recommended security measures, designed to increase the safety of people and property at these facilities. Why GAO Did This Study Over one million employees and a range of visitors seeking services at federal facilities depend on FPS to ensure the safety of both people and property at these locations. This report examines stakeholders’ perspectives on FPS’s performance of three key activities. GAO identified key activities from FPS data on work hours. GAO held discussion groups with stakeholders from 27 randomly selected facilities where FPS provided guard services and responded to incidents in fiscal year 2019 and analyzed stakeholder responses from 2017-2019 to GSA’s and FPS’s feedback instruments. These sources of stakeholder views are not representative but collectively provide insight into stakeholders’ satisfaction with how FPS is performing key activities. GAO also reviewed agency documents; interviewed FPS officials about FPS’s performance; and compared FPS’s security assessment reports to criteria in GAO’s Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide .
- List Broker Pleads Guilty to Facilitating Elder Fraud Schemes
April 23, 2021A New York man pleaded guilty today to supplying lists of consumers’ names and addresses for use in schemes that targeted vulnerable victims.
- Guatemala’s Public Ministry’s Continued Attacks Against Independent Judges and Prosecutors
March 8, 2022Ned Price, Department [Read More…]
- Joint Statement on the U.S.-Kazakhstan Enhanced Strategic Partnership Dialogue
December 24, 2021Office of the [Read More…]