Ned Price, Department Spokesperson
On February 26, 2022, Ukraine filed an application at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to initiate proceedings against the Russian Federation under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Ukraine seeks to address Russia’s groundless claims that genocide has occurred in the Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts of Ukraine and establish that Russia has no lawful basis to take military action on the basis of those false claims. Ukraine has also requested the ICJ exercise its authority to indicate provisional measures to preserve Ukraine’s rights and limit the ongoing and irreparable harm to the Ukrainian people as well as Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders.
As the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, the ICJ has a vital role to play in the peaceful settlement of disputes. Ukraine also requested the Court call upon Russia to halt immediately all military actions in Ukraine pending the Court’s review. Today, in response to that request, the Court called on the Russian Federation to act in a manner that would allow any provisional measures ordered by the Court to have an actual impact. This is another clear indication that Russia must cease its military activities in Ukraine.
Considering the gravity of the crisis in Ukraine that has resulted from Russia’s unprovoked invasion, we trust the Court is taking into consideration the dire circumstances and rapidly unfolding events and hope that it will act with utmost urgency on Ukraine’s request for provisional measures.
Each day that Russia is unconstrained in its aggression is a day that brings more violence, suffering, death, and destruction in Ukraine. The United States stands with the people of Ukraine.
- Department Press Briefing – February 7, 2022
February 8, 2022Ned Price, Department [Read More…]
- Chief Executive Officer Pleads Guilty to Submitting Hundreds of False Monitoring Reports
October 26, 2021A Tennessee woman pleaded guilty today to fabricating discharge monitoring reports required under the Clean Water Act and submitting those fraudulent documents to state regulators in Tennessee and Mississippi.
- Appointment of Ambassador Stuart E. Eizenstat as Special Adviser on Holocaust Issues
December 27, 2021
- Honoring Anticorruption Champions
February 23, 2021Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
- Acting Assistant Secretary Reeker’s Travel to Italy, Albania, and North Macedonia
June 18, 2021
- 2020 Census: Census Bureau Needs to Assess Data Quality Concerns Stemming from Recent Design Changes
December 3, 2020The U.S. Census Bureau (Bureau) responded to COVID-19 in multiple phases. The Bureau first suspended field operations in March 2020 for two successive 2-week periods to promote the safety of its workforce and the public. In April 2020, the Bureau extended this suspension to a total of 3 months for Non-response Follow-up (NRFU), the most labor-intensive decennial field operation that involves hundreds of thousands of enumerators going door-to-door to collect census data from households that have not yet responded to the census. At that time, the Department of Commerce also requested from Congress a 120-day extension to statutory deadlines providing census data for congressional apportionment and redistricting purposes, and the Bureau developed and implemented plans to deliver the population counts by those requested deadlines. The Bureau implemented NRFU in multiple waves between July 16 and August 9, 2020, to ensure that operational systems and procedures were ready for nationwide use. The Bureau considered COVID-19 case trends, the availability of personal protective equipment, and the availability of staff in deciding which areas to start NRFU first. On August 3, 2020, the Bureau announced that, as directed by the Secretary of Commerce, it would accelerate its operational timeframes to deliver population counts by the original statutory deadlines. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in September 2020 issued an injunction that reversed the Secretary’s August 2020 directions for design changes and the Bureau’s adherence to the statutory deadlines, but the Supreme Court ultimately stayed this injunction in October 2020 and allowed the Bureau to proceed with its August 2020 design changes. As a result, the Bureau shortened NRFU by over 2 weeks and reduced the time allotted for response processing after NRFU from 153 days to 77 days. GAO has previously noted that late design changes create increased risk for a quality census. The Bureau is examining ways to share quality indicators of the census in the near term and has a series of planned operational assessments, coverage measurement exercises, and data quality teams that are positioned to retrospectively study the effects of design changes made in the response to COVID-19 on census data quality. The Bureau is still in the process of updating its plans for these efforts to examine the range of operational modifications made in response to COVID-19, including the August 2020 and later changes. As part of the Bureau’s assessments, it will be important to address a number of concerns GAO identified about how late changes to the census design could affect data quality. These concerns range from how the altered time frames have affected population counts during field data collection to what effects, if any, compressed and streamlined post-data collection processing of census data may have on the Bureau’s ability to detect and fully address processing or other errors before releasing the apportionment and redistricting tabulations. Addressing these concerns as part of the overall 2020 assessment will help the Bureau ensure public confidence in the 2020 Census and inform future census planning efforts. As the Bureau was mailing out invitations to respond to the decennial census and was preparing for fieldwork to count nonresponding households, much of the nation began closing down to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to the pandemic, the Bureau has made a series of changes to the design of the census. Understanding the chronology of events and the Bureau’s decisions, along with the factors and information sources that it considered, can help to shed light on the implications and tradeoffs of the Bureau’s response. This report, the first in a series of retrospective reviews on the 2020 Census, examines the key changes that the Bureau made in response to the COVID-19 outbreak and how those changes affect the cost and quality of the census. GAO performed its work under the authority of the Comptroller General to conduct evaluations on the 2020 Census to assist Congress with its oversight responsibilities. GAO reviewed Bureau decision memos, interviewed Bureau officials, and consulted contemporaneous COVID-19 case data for context on the Bureau’s COVID-19 response. GAO is recommending that the Bureau update and implement its assessments to address data quality concerns identified in this report, as well as any operational benefits. In its comments, the Department of Commerce agreed with GAO’s findings and recommendation. The Bureau also provided technical comments, which GAO incorporated as appropriate. For more information, contact J. Christopher Mihm at (202) 512-6806 or email@example.com or Nick Marinos at 202-512-9342 or by email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Antitrust Division Announces Updates To Civil Investigative Demand Forms And Deposition Process
September 10, 2020Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division announced today that the Antitrust Division has implemented two uniform updates to its Civil Investigative Demand (CID) forms and deposition process:
- U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen Lenderking’s Return from Saudi Arabia
August 1, 2021
- EEG Testing and Private Investment Companies Pay $15.3 Million to Resolve Kickback and False Billing Allegations
July 21, 2021Two Texas companies have agreed to pay a combined $15.3 million to resolve allegations of kickbacks and other misconduct resulting in the submission of false claims to federal health care programs.
- United States and ASEAN: A Billion Futures Across the Indo-Pacific
November 15, 2020
- [Protest of Navy Methods for Obtaining Information About Commercially Available Shotguns and Ammunition]
September 17, 2021A firm protested a Navy announcement to obtain information about commercially available shotguns and ammunition, contending that the announcement was ambiguous, capricious, and unduly restrictive. GAO held that it would not consider the protest, since the announcement was for information purposes only and did not involve the issuance of a solicitation or the award or proposed award of a contract. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.
- The Department of State Breaks Ground on the New U.S. Consulate General in Chiang Mai, Thailand
September 26, 2020
- Justice Department Settles with Insurance Agency to Resolve Immigration-Related Discrimination Claims
January 24, 2022The Department of Justice today announced that it has reached a settlement agreement with James A. Scott & Son Inc., an insurance agency doing business as Scott Insurance headquartered in Lynchburg, Virginia.
- Two Arrested in Los Angeles for Their Roles in Hospice Fraud Conspiracy
December 2, 2021Two California hospice facility owners were arrested today in Los Angeles on criminal charges related to their alleged participation in a kickback and health care fraud scheme.
- On the Passing of King Goodwill Zwelithini kaBhekuzulu
March 12, 2021Ned Price, Department [Read More…]
- United States Files Complaint Against Nutter Home Loans for Forging Certifications and Using Unqualified Underwriters to Approve Government-Insured Reverse Mortgages
September 25, 2020The United States has filed a complaint under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 and the False Claims Act against Nutter Home Loans, f/k/a James B. Nutter & Co. (Nutter), for forging certifications and using unqualified underwriters to approve Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insured Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECM), the Department of Justice announced today.
- Small Business Administration: Steps Taken to Verify Tribal Recognition for 8(a) Program
January 3, 2022What GAO Found The U.S. Small Business Administration’s (SBA) 8(a) Business Development program was created to help develop small businesses owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals and entities, including Indian tribes that are federally or state-recognized. The program provides such businesses with an opportunity to compete on an equal basis in the American economy. Specifically, businesses that participate in the 8(a) program can receive federal contracts that have been set aside for 8(a) program participants. According to SBA’s standard operating procedures, for businesses seeking entry into the program based on association with a recognized Indian tribe, SBA’s Business Opportunity Specialists (BOS) are responsible for verifying tribal recognition during the application process. The BOS determines whether the Indian tribe is recognized for SBA purposes based on a review of the business applicant’s supporting evidence compared to tribal information maintained at the federal or state government levels. The Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) publishes an annual list of all federally recognized Indian tribes. Additionally, some state governments publish information regarding the Indian tribes that they have recognized. GAO’s analysis of application data for fiscal years 2018 through 2020 indicates that all but one of the 122 participating 8(a) businesses were associated with a recognized Indian tribe as claimed. As a result of this finding, SBA officials told GAO that SBA is initiating steps to terminate that one business’s participation in the 8(a) program. Further, GAO’s illustrative covert testing results demonstrated that SBA took steps to verify the recognition status of fictitious Indian tribes, despite not yet documenting formal procedures for verifying tribal recognition. Results from GAO’s Evaluation of SBA’s Verification of Tribal Recognition Why GAO Did This Study According to SBA officials, in fiscal year 2020, federal 8(a) contract obligations for the overall SBA 8(a) program totaled about $19.7 billion and 3,364 8(a) participants were awarded federal 8(a) contracts for the same period. Prior GAO and SBA Office of Inspector General (OIG) reports identified challenges regarding SBA’s oversight of the 8(a) program. For example, in March 2021, the OIG reported that SBA had no formal procedures for verifying the tribal recognition status of Indian tribes associated with 8(a) applications, which SBA plans to address by December 2021. GAO was asked to evaluate the effectiveness of SBA’s verification of the tribal recognition of the Indian tribe associated with 8(a) businesses applying to the program. This report addresses: (1) the extent to which business applicants certified to participate in the 8(a) program were associated with a recognized Indian tribe as claimed for fiscal years 2018 through 2020; and (2) what covert testing results demonstrated about SBA’s verification of tribal recognition status in fiscal year 2021. GAO compared SBA’s tribal name data to information maintained by the BIA and research GAO conducted previously. GAO also used covert tests to assess whether SBA took steps to verify tribal recognition of fictitious Indian tribes associated with GAO’s fictitious applications. These tests were illustrative and cannot be generalized to all applications. For more information, contact Seto J. Bagdoyan at (202) 512-6722 or email@example.com or James (Howard) Arp at (202) 512-6722 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Cypress medical sales representative agrees to settle allegations regarding neurostimulator devices
In Justice NewsDecember 1, 2021A 47-year-old medical [Read More…]
- GAO Audits Involving DOD: Status of Efforts to Schedule and Hold Timely Entrance Conferences
August 14, 2020GAO began 42 new audits that involved the Department of Defense (DOD) in the third quarter of fiscal year 2020. Of the 42 requested entrance conferences (i.e., initial meetings between agency officials and GAO staff) for those audits, DOD scheduled 41 within 14 days of notification and held all 42 entrance conferences within 30 days of notification. Scheduling was delayed for one entrance conference, which was scheduled 21 days after notification, because DOD and GAO were working to reach agreement on the primary action officer, which is the appropriate office or component within the department that coordinates DOD’s response to the audit. The entrance conference was held 8 days after it was scheduled. Entrance conferences allow GAO to communicate its audit objectives and enable agencies to assign key personnel to support the audit work. GAO’s agency protocols govern GAO’s relationships with audited agencies. These protocols assist GAO in scheduling entrance conferences with key agency officials within 14 days of receiving notice of a new audit. The ability of the Congress to conduct effective oversight of federal agencies is enhanced through the timely completion of GAO audits. In past years, DOD experienced difficulty meeting the protocol target for the timely facilitation of entrance conferences. In Senate Report 116-48 accompanying a bill for the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, the Senate Armed Services Committee included a provision for GAO to review DOD’s scheduling and holding of entrance conferences. In this report, GAO’s agency protocols govern GAO’s relationships with audited agencies. These protocols assist GAO in scheduling entrance conferences with key agency officials within 14 days of receiving notice of a new audit. The ability of the Congress to conduct effective oversight of federal agencies is enhanced through the timely completion of GAO audits. In past years, DOD experienced difficulty meeting the protocol target for the timely facilitation of entrance conferences. In Senate Report 116-48 accompanying a bill for the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, the Senate Armed Services Committee included a provision for GAO to review DOD’s scheduling and holding of entrance conferences. In this report, GAO evaluates the extent to which DOD scheduled entrance conferences within 14 days of receiving notice of a new audit, consistent with GAO’s agency protocols, and held those conferences within 30 days. This is the third of four quarterly reports that GAO will produce on this topic for fiscal year 2020. In the first two quarterly reports, GAO found that DOD had improved its ability to meet the protocol target. GAO analyzed data on GAO audits involving DOD and initiated in the third quarter of fiscal year 2020 (April 1, 2020, through June 30, 2020). Specifically, GAO identified the number of notification letters requesting entrance conferences that were sent to DOD during that time period. GAO determined the number of days between when DOD received the notification letter for each new audit and when DOD scheduled the entrance conference and assessed whether DOD scheduled entrance conferences within 14 days of notification, which is the time frame identified in GAO’s agency protocols. GAO also determined the date that each requested entrance conference was held by collecting this information from the relevant GAO team for each audit and assessed whether DOD held entrance conferences for new audits within 30 days of notification, which was the time frame identified in the mandate for this review For more information, contact Elizabeth Field at (202) 512-2775 or Fielde1@gao.gov.
- Secretary Blinken’s Call with Turkish Foreign Minister Cavusoglu
February 28, 2022