More than 28 million Americans will have an eating disorder in their lifetime. Individuals of all ages, race/ethnicities, genders, sexual orientations, body shapes, weights, socioeconomic statuses, and levels of physical activity can develop an eating disorder. Eating disorders are more likely to appear in teen years or young adulthood, and cases have increased among children, older adults, and military service members.
Eating disorders affect individuals from diverse backgrounds. Research shows that although Black women have similar or higher rates of binge eating as White women, Black individuals have been underrepresented in clinical trials. Individuals with higher body weight may benefit from having healthcare professionals who specialize in obesity and eating disorders collaborating on a treatment plan, yet their care is not often integrated which may hinder successful interventions. For many individuals who are LGBTQI+, bullying and intimidation heighten the need to seek help from health care providers. Sexual minority women often report higher BMI, body dissatisfaction, and eating pathology. Compared to non-athletes, athletes are at a higher risk of developing eating disorders, with female collegiate athletes being identified as higher risk than male athletes. Across demographics, eating disorders often go undertreated or untreated.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, eating disorder-related hospital admissions among adolescents and young adults have increased has contributed to higher stress and anxiety, two risk factors for eating disorders. daily routines has also facilitated unhealthy eating patterns. Increased exposure to social media has heightened body dissatisfaction. As a result, COVID-19 has exacerbated the rates of eating disorders.
As physicians with expertise in adolescent medicine, we are committed to improving diagnosis and treatment for anyone with these conditions. Untreated eating disorders can cause serious health conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, tooth loss, brain damage, sleep apnea, and bone loss. They also can increase anxiety, depression, and risk of suicide. With detection and intervention, full recovery is possible.
At HHS, we are dedicated to enhancing the health and well-being of all Americans. Our work to improve health outcomes for those with eating disorders are outlined in three main commitments.
We’re committed to improving care.
During National Eating Disorder Awareness Week, we will host a virtual summit with experts in the field to understand how the COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to eating disorders. The meeting will highlight how health care providers have adapted their practices to improve screening and treatment. To view this meeting, please visit: https://www.hhs.gov/live/live-2/index.html#7420
Through the SAMHSA-funded National Center of Excellence for Eating Disorders, we are expanding health care provider training, so that patients with eating disorders receive the diagnosis and care they need.
At NIH, the National Institutes of Mental Health is currently conducting or funding more than 65 clinical studies to help better understand the biological, genetic, and social factors that contribute to eating disorders.
We’re committed to reducing stigma.
HHS is joining the National Alliance for Eating Disorders’ Lisa Murano, Ginger Zee, and Elisa Donovan in an Instagram Live event on February 24th at 12 p.m. ET. Join us to hear personal experiences and learn how we all can support individuals with eating disorders. For more details, visit HHS’ Instagram account at: https://www.instagram.com/hhsgov
We’re committed to expanding prevention awareness.
We are providing tools and resources to help anyone recognize symptoms and support individuals who demonstrate signs of an eating disorder.
If you or someone you love is at risk of an eating disorder or is in crisis, help is available at:
- COPS Office Announces Funding to Combat Illegal Opioids and Methamphetamine
November 1, 2021The Department of Justice’s Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office) announced today $44.5 million in funding to support state-level law enforcement agencies in combating the illegal manufacturing and distribution of methamphetamine, heroin and prescription opioids.
- Priority Open Recommendations: Department of Veterans Affairs
May 17, 2021What GAO Found In April 2020, GAO identified 33 priority recommendations for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Since then, VA has implemented 13 of those recommendations by, among other things, taking actions to ensure that veterans receive evidence-based mental health treatment. In May 2021, GAO identified 8 additional priority recommendations for VA, bringing the total number to 28. These recommendations involve the following areas: response to the COVID-19 pandemic; veterans’ access to timely health care; the veterans community care program; human capital management; information technology; appeals reform for disability benefits; quality of care and patient safety; veteran suicide prevention; efficiency within the VA health care system; national policy documents; procurement policies and practices; and capital planning. Addressing the high priority recommendations identified above has the potential to significantly improve VA’s operations, including those related to COVID-19. Why GAO Did This Study Priority open recommendations are the GAO recommendations that warrant priority attention from heads of key departments or agencies because their implementation could save large amounts of money; improve congressional and/or executive branch decision-making on major issues; eliminate mismanagement, fraud, and abuse; or ensure that programs comply with laws and funds are legally spent, among other benefits. Since 2015 GAO has sent letters to selected agencies to highlight the importance of implementing such recommendations. For more information, contact A. Nicole Clowers at (202) 512-7114 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
- U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum Honors DOJ with Elie Wiesel Award
April 23, 2021The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum last night conferred their highest honor, the Elie Wiesel Award, on the U.S. Department of Justice in recognition of the successes of its longtime enforcement program’s efforts to identify, investigate, and prosecute participants in World War II-era Nazi crimes.
- United States Takes Action Against Violators of Religious Freedom
December 7, 2020Michael R. Pompeo, [Read More…]
- Chinese Man Extradited for Financing Turtle-Trafficking Ring
December 10, 2020A Chinese citizen was extradited from Malaysia to the United States today to face charges for money laundering.
- On the 31st Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act
July 26, 2021Ned Price, Department [Read More…]
- U.S. Seeks to Recover More Than $300 Million in Additional Assets Traceable to Funds Allegedly Misappropriated from Malaysian Sovereign Wealth Fund
September 16, 2020The Justice Department announced today the filing of civil forfeiture complaints seeking the forfeiture and recovery of more than $300 million in additional assets allegedly associated with an international conspiracy to launder funds misappropriated from 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), a Malaysian sovereign wealth fund.
- Secretary Antony J. Blinken at Meet and Greet with Evacuation Operations Staff
September 8, 2021
- Mauritania’s National Day
November 28, 2021
- MS-13 New Jersey Leaders Convicted of Racketeering Offenses and Murder
November 17, 2021A federal jury in New Jersey convicted three El Salvadoran nationals on Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) charges, including murder in aid of racketeering, stemming from their participation in Mara Salvatrucha, a violent international criminal racketeering enterprise commonly known as MS-13.
- DOD Acquisition Outcomes: A Case for Change
August 25, 2021The Department of Defense (DOD) is shepherding a portfolio of major weapon systems valued at about $1.3 trillion. How DOD is managing this investment has been a matter of concern for some time. Since 1990, GAO has designated DOD’s weapon system acquisitions as a high-risk area for fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement. DOD has experienced cost overruns, missed deadlines, performance shortfalls, and persistent management problems. In light of the serious budget pressures facing the nation, such problems are especially troubling. GAO has issued hundreds of reports addressing broad-based issues, such as best practices, as well as reports focusing on individual acquisitions. These reports have included many recommendations. Congress asked GAO to testify on possible problems with and improvements to defense acquisition policy. In doing so, we highlight the risks of conducting business as usual and identify some of the solutions we have found in successful acquisition programs and organizations.DOD is facing a cascading number of problems in managing its acquisitions. Cost increases incurred while developing new weapon systems mean DOD cannot produce as many of those weapons as intended nor can it be relied on to deliver to the warfighter when promised. Military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq are consuming a large share of DOD resources and causing the department to invest more money sooner than expected to replace or fix existing weapons. Meanwhile, DOD is intent on transforming military operations and has its eye on multiple megasystems that are expected to be the most expensive and complex ever. These costly conditions are running head-on into the nation’s unsustainable fiscal path. DOD knows what to do to achieve more successful outcomes but finds it difficult to apply the necessary discipline and controls or assign much-needed accountability. DOD has written into policy an approach that emphasizes attaining a certain level of knowledge at critical junctures before managers agree to invest more money in the next phase of weapon system development. This knowledge-based approach results in evolutionary–that is, incremental, manageable, predictable–development and inserts several controls to help managers gauge progress in meeting cost, schedule, and performance goals. But DOD is not employing the knowledge-based approach, discipline is lacking, and business cases are weak. Persistent practices show a decided lack of restraint. DOD’s requirements process generates more demand for new programs than fiscal resources can support. DOD compounds the problem by approving so many highly complex and interdependent programs. Once too many programs are approved to start, the budgeting process exacerbates problems. Because programs are funded annually and departmentwide, cross-portfolio priorities have not been established, competition for funding continues over time, forcing programs to view success as the ability to secure the next funding increment rather than delivering capabilities when and as promised. Improving this condition requires discipline in the requirements and budgetary processes. Determining who should be held accountable for deviations and what penalties are needed is crucial. If DOD cannot discipline itself now to execute programs within fiscal realities, then draconian, budget-driven decisions may have to be made later.
- The Quad Welcome UNITAMS Announcement on Facilitating Discussions to Resolve Sudan’s Political Crisis
January 8, 2022Office of the [Read More…]
- Recognizing World Ocean Day 2021
June 8, 2021
- Medicaid Program Integrity: Action Needed to Ensure CMS Completes Financial Management Reviews in a Timely Manner
November 14, 2020Since fiscal year 2016, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has initiated 49 financial management reviews (FMR) to examine state Medicaid agencies’ compliance with a variety of federal policies. These 49 FMRs frequently found one or more instances of states’ non-compliance. CMS identified instances of non-compliance that had a financial impact totaling about $358 million. CMS identified internal control weaknesses and directed states to make changes to their Medicaid policies. However, FMRs have not always examined topics or states that reflect the areas of highest expenditures. In 2018, GAO recommended that CMS improve its targeting of oversight resources. CMS agreed with this recommendation, but has not yet implemented it. In addition, CMS guidance generally expects draft FMR reports to be completed in the year they began. However, two-thirds of FMRs (26 of 39) initiated in fiscal years 2016 to 2019 were still under review in June 2020, which can delay state actions to address program vulnerabilities. CMS officials said that at least five states would not take actions—such as returning federal funds for unallowable expenditures—until they received a complete report. Status of Financial Management Reviews (FMR) Initiated in Fiscal Years 2016 to 2019, as of June 2020 CMS officials cited competing priorities, decreased staff, and the agency’s review process—which involves multiple steps and levels of review—as factors affecting their use of FMRs for oversight. CMS took steps during the course of GAO’s review to complete FMRs that had been under review for several years. The agency has not established time frames for the completion of individual review steps or for its overall review of FMR reports. Developing and implementing such time frames would provide a tool to help monitor CMS’s progress in completing FMRs and ensure prompt action on FMR findings. Over the last two decades, Medicaid—a joint, federal-state health care financing program for low-income and medically needy individuals—more than tripled in expenditures and doubled in enrollment. CMS estimates the program will continue to grow, exceeding $1 trillion in expenditures and 81 million enrollees in 2028. The size and growth of Medicaid present oversight challenges. CMS is responsible for assuring that states’ Medicaid expenditures comply with federal requirements, and FMRs are one of its financial oversight tools. CMS generally directs its regional offices to conduct one focused FMR each year on an area of high risk within their regions, typically within one state. GAO was asked to examine CMS’s use of FMRs. In this report, GAO examines the extent to which CMS has used FMRs to oversee state Medicaid programs. GAO reviewed CMS documentation on FMR findings and their status, and resources assigned to FMRs and other financial review functions. GAO also interviewed CMS officials from all 10 regional offices and the central office, and assessed CMS’s FMR policies and procedures against federal internal control standards. CMS should develop and implement time frames to ensure the timely completion of FMRs. The Department of Health and Human Services concurred with our recommendation. For more information, contact Carolyn L. Yocom at (202) 512-7114 or email@example.com.
- Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Chilean Foreign Minister Andres Allamand Before Their Meeting
July 16, 2021
- Justice Department Settles with Indiana School District to Resolve Disability Discrimination Investigation into School Seclusion and Restraint Practices
December 31, 2020The Justice Department today announced a settlement agreement with the North Gibson School Corporation in Princeton, Indiana, to address and prevent the discriminatory secluding and restraining of students with disabilities.
- Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at a Joint Press Availability
May 6, 2021
- Secretary Antony J. Blinken Meet and Greet with Embassy Jerusalem Staff
May 25, 2021
- Public Comments Welcome on Draft Policy Statement on Licensing Negotiations and Remedies for Standards-Essential Patents Subject to F/RAND Commitments
December 6, 2021The Department of Justice announced today that it is requesting public comment on a new draft policy statement concerning standards-essential patents (SEPs) that seeks to promote good-faith licensing negotiations and addresses the scope of remedies available to patent owners that have agreed to license their essential technologies on reasonable and non-discriminatory or fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (F/RAND) terms. The Justice Department worked with U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in responding to President Biden’s recent Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy, which encouraged the agencies to review the 2019 Policy Statement on Remedies for Standards-Essential Patents Subject to Voluntary F/RAND Commitments to ensure that it adequately promoted competition. Together the agencies, after consulting with the Federal Trade Commission, are now issuing a revised draft statement for public comment.
- Armed drug dealer who sold drugs with child in house pleads guilty
In Justice NewsFebruary 9, 2022A 30-year-old Corpus [Read More…]