Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State
QUESTION: All reports in the American media that intelligence is public in – the exact date of the attack, which is convinced that Russia will attack Ukraine day by day. Can we consider that as some specific actions as not giving Putin any room for a maneuver – for a maneuver? Or is just – is it just a coincidence?
SECRETARY BLINKEN: We’ve done everything we can to share whatever information we receive, get access to, share it with – of course, with our Ukrainian partners as well as with other allies and partners, just to make sure that everyone is on notice about what could happen. We have not seen a definitive decision by President Putin, but we do know that he’s put in place the capacity to act on very, very short notice. And so as we’ve said, if he chooses the path of renewed aggression against Ukraine, it could happen at any time and it’s important that people understand that even as we work overtime through diplomacy to try to prevent Russia from renewing its aggression.
QUESTION: It just feels like with this revealing the information, you’re always leaving Putin behind because when you’re saying that the actions will be on the 15th of February, it feels like it’s not going to be like that because everybody knows that already.
SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, it’s important to, I think, again, put Russia on notice that we see what it’s planning and we see what it might do, and to share that information with our partners and to share it, as necessary, with the world.
QUESTION: Thank you. So today Russian Duma ask Putin to recognize Ukrainian occupied region or bloc as independent. So Putin should – could decide, but he didn’t say anything directly, particularly. Can he use this decision – his decision as a blackmail, perhaps?
SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, this effort is totally inconsistent with the Minsk Agreements. It’s in contradiction of the Minsk Agreements. And so if Russia is serious about implementing Minsk, it has to reject this effort, and it’s certainly something that we don’t recognize and don’t accept.
QUESTION: Is there any cautious optimism that Russia said again it’s ready for dialogue? Today I’ve heard that thought in – from Stoltenberg.
SECRETARY BLINKEN: It’s not a question, for me at least, of being optimistic or pessimistic. It’s a question of focusing on the facts, on what we see, and on what Russia is doing. Yes, it said some more positive things about diplomacy in recent days, but I think your foreign minister, Foreign Minister Kuleba, had it exactly right when he said we should be less focused on what Russia says and more focused on what it does. We have yet to see any removal of forces surrounding Ukraine, any pullback, any end to the so-called exercises that Russia has claimed it’s engaged in. That’s what we’re focused on. And if we see that, that would be positive, and I think that would create a better environment, a better atmosphere for pursuing diplomacy.
But we’re prepared either way. If Russia chooses the path of diplomacy, we’re fully prepared to engage. At the same time, if they choose the path of aggression, we’re prepared to respond to that too.
QUESTION: Am I correct the United States intelligence don’t see any withdrawal from Ukrainian border?
SECRETARY BLINKEN: That’s correct. We have yet to see any pullback, any withdrawal of Russian forces from around Ukraine’s borders. We’re watching that very carefully, and again, it’s very important to look at what Russia actually does, not what it says it’s doing.
QUESTION: And the last question that I couldn’t ask you that – could not now ask you about the American embassy in Ukraine. Don’t you think there is a chance that by abandoning the embassy it might send a signal that Russia can now start their attack?
SECRETARY BLINKEN: We’ve been very clear that if Russia engages in renewed aggression against Ukraine, there will be massive consequences, and that’s come from not just us, but from virtually all of our partners in the – in Europe, NATO, the European Union, the G7, the world’s largest democratic economies. So that’s been very clear. I think President Putin knows that if he makes the terrible mistake of renewing aggression, that’s what he’ll face. And at the same time, we are – we continue to work to support Ukraine’s defenses. We’ve provided over the last year well more than $600 million in 2021, more than at any previous year. But we also want to make sure that we’re supporting your economy. Just yesterday we announced a sovereign loan guarantee of a billion dollars in support of the economy.
When it comes to the embassy, look, I have a unique responsibility as Secretary of State, which is to look out for the safety and well-being of the people who work for me, and that’s really unique to me. So we did make the decision to temporarily relocate our diplomatic functions from Kyiv to Lviv out of an abundance of precaution. It’s the prudent thing to do because, again, my personal responsibility is to the safety and security of our people. But they continue to work directly with their counterparts in the Ukrainian Government. They continue to support the very – the different programs we have in support of Ukraine. And of course, I’m on the phone almost every day with Dmytro Kuleba; others are on the phone with President Zelenskyy and other senior officials.
And so our support, our engagement, our work with the Ukrainian Government remains very, very strong.
QUESTION: Is there any expiry date for that removal – removing the embassy?
SECRETARY BLINKEN: We’ll be focused on the facts. We’ll be focused on what we see. And again, unfortunately, we haven’t seen any pullback of Russian forces, but if it’s clear that Russia is truly engaged on a diplomatic path and the military threat goes away, of course, that changes the situation. But that’s what we’re focused on.
QUESTION: Thank you very much for your time. Thank you very much.
SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you. Good to be with you. Nice to see you again. Thank you.
QUESTION: Nice to see you.
SECRETARY BLINKEN: Bye-bye.
- Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter of the Antitrust Division Delivers Remarks to the New York State Bar Association Antitrust Section
January 24, 2022More from: January 25, [Read More…]
- Department Press Briefing – March 8, 2021
March 8, 2021Ned Price, Department [Read More…]
- Readout of Justice Department Leadership Meeting with Election Officials
January 26, 2022Attorney General Merrick B. Garland today convened a virtual discussion with a bipartisan group of election officials to provide an update on the work of the Election Threats Task Force.
- Wife of “El Chapo” Sentenced to Prison for Drug Trafficking and Money Laundering
November 30, 2021The wife of Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman Loera, leader of the Mexican drug-trafficking organization known as the Sinaloa Cartel, was sentenced today to 36 months in prison followed by four years of supervised release for charges related to international drug trafficking, money laundering, and a criminal violation of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act (the Kingpin Act).
- Secretary Antony J. Blinken with Indian Minister of External Affairs Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar After Their Meeting
May 5, 2021
- Secretary Blinken’s Call with Canadian Foreign Minister Joly
November 3, 2021Office of the [Read More…]
- Georgia’s National Day
May 26, 2021
- Justice Department Requires Divestitures in Neenah Enterprises Inc.’s Acquisition of US Foundry
October 14, 2021The Department of Justice announced today that it will require Neenah Enterprises Inc. (NEI), U.S. Holdings Inc. (U.S. Holdings), and U.S. Foundry and Manufacturing Corporation (US Foundry) to divest certain gray iron municipal castings assets in order to proceed with NEI’s proposed acquisition of substantially all of the assets of US Foundry. NEI and US Foundry are two of only three significant suppliers of gray iron municipal castings in eleven eastern and southern states. Gray iron municipal castings are customized molded iron products such as manhole covers and frames used to access subterranean areas and grates and drains used to direct water in roadway, parking, and industrial areas.
- THE OCEAN CLEANUP PROVES VIABILITY OF TECHNOLOGY
February 15, 2022Infamous Garbage Patch [Read More…]
- Texas Wedding Planner Sentenced in COVID-19 Fraud Scheme
September 16, 2021A Texas man was sentenced today in the Eastern District of Texas to 31 months in prison and three years of supervised release for perpetrating a scheme to fraudulently obtain more than $3.3 million in Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (SBA) under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act.
- Defense Headquarters: Guidance Needed to Transition U.S. Central Command’s Costs to the Base Budget
In U.S GAO NewsAugust 24, 2021What GAO Found GAO analysis of U.S. Central Command’s (CENTCOM) and its service component commands’ data shows considerable increases in the number of authorized positions over the past decade. The Department of Defense (DOD) is planning reductions, but the extent of these reductions has not been finalized. The number of authorized military and civilian positions at CENTCOM grew about 70 percent from almost 1,590 in fiscal year 2001 to almost 2,730 in fiscal year 2013, primarily driven by increases in the number of positions within CENTCOM’s intelligence directorate and its theater special operations command. However, focusing solely on trends in authorized military and civilian positions provides an incomplete picture of the personnel dedicated to CENTCOM because the command relies heavily on temporary personnel and contractors to augment its headquarters. GAO analysis of CENTCOM’s data found that the command headquarters had about 550 temporary personnel, who officials stated are primarily responsible for supporting the command’s operations in Afghanistan and do not fill any permanent authorized positions, and 1,100 contractor personnel in fiscal year 2013. Additionally, GAO found that authorized military and civilian positions at CENTCOM’s Army and Marine Corps service component commands had also increased. In response to the Secretary of Defense’s direction to reduce headquarters spending, DOD is planning to decrease personnel at CENTCOM and its service component command headquarters. For example, CENTCOM is planning to reduce its total authorized positions by 353 positions from fiscal years 2015 through 2019. As DOD’s headquarters reduction efforts continue and contingency operations in Afghanistan wind down, the department has recognized that CENTCOM and its service components’ have enduring headquarters costs that are expected to continue after ongoing operations end, but the majority of the costs to operate and support CENTCOM, two of its service component commands, and its theater special operations command headquarters are funded with overseas contingency operations appropriations. For example, CENTCOM’s Marine Corps service component command funded $34 million out of a total of $42 million in headquarters costs in fiscal year 2013 with overseas contingency operations appropriations. CENTCOM and its components have determined some of these costs are enduring and expected to continue after the end of contingency operations, such as for Isa Air Base in Bahrain, but the military services have not transitioned or developed a time frame to transition these enduring costs to DOD’s base budget. DOD’s base budget contains the department’s priorities for allocating resources. DOD officials stated that the department has not issued guidance that addresses how to fund these costs or established a time frame for when to transition them from DOD’s overseas contingency operations budget to its base budget because DOD is waiting on decisions about future military involvement in Afghanistan. Officials also stated that the constrained fiscal environment has contributed to the department’s reluctance to transition overseas contingency operations costs to DOD’s base budget. However, without guidance that addresses how to pay for enduring headquarters costs funded by overseas contingency operations appropriations and a time frame to transition these costs to DOD’s base budget, DOD may not be able to fully resource these activities once the funding decreases or ceases. Why GAO Did This Study CENTCOM is one of six geographic combatant commands that DOD operates to perform its military missions. CENTCOM’s geographic region is composed of countries located in the Middle East, North Africa, and Central and South Asia. CENTCOM and each of its service component commands’ headquarters are composed of military and civilian personnel and receive millions of dollars in funding each year to accomplish assigned missions. GAO was mandated to review CENTCOM’s resources. This report (1) identifies trends in personnel devoted to CENTCOM and its service component commands since fiscal year 2001 and any steps DOD is planning to take for reducing personnel in the future, and (2) assesses how DOD funds CENTCOM and its service component commands’ headquarters costs. GAO analyzed data on authorized positions, temporary personnel, and headquarters costs for CENTCOM and its service component commands from fiscal years 2001 through 2013. GAO also interviewed DOD officials about commands’ resources and plans for funding headquarters costs.
- Albania National Day
November 28, 2020Michael R. Pompeo, [Read More…]
- Four Chinese Nationals Working with the Ministry of State Security Charged with Global Computer Intrusion Campaign Targeting Intellectual Property and Confidential Business Information, Including Infectious Disease Research
July 19, 2021A federal grand jury in San Diego, California, returned an indictment in May charging four nationals and residents of the People’s Republic of China with a campaign to hack into the computer systems of dozens of victim companies, universities and government entities in the United States and abroad between 2011 and 2018.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report
August 9, 2021
- Disarmament Law and Morality: A Critique
November 13, 2020Dr. Christopher Ashley [Read More…]
- Attorney General Merrick B. Garland’s Statement on Aon and Willis Towers Watson Decision to Terminate Merger Agreement
July 26, 2021Attorney General Merrick B. Garland today released the following statement on Aon plc’s and Willis Towers Watson’s announcement that the firms agreed to terminate their planned $30 billion merger. The Department of Justice filed a civil antitrust lawsuit on June 16, 2021, to stop the merger, alleging that the combination of Aon and Willis Towers Watson, the second- and third-largest insurance brokers in the world, would reduce competition for the business of American companies, effectively consolidating the industry’s “Big Three” into a Big Two.
- Justice Department Statement on Law Enforcement Assistance to the Haitian Government
July 12, 2021The U.S. Department of Justice today released the following statement from spokesman Anthony Coley on department efforts to provide law enforcement assistance to the people and Government of Haiti:
- Weapon Systems Cybersecurity: Guidance Would Help DOD Programs Better Communicate Requirements to Contractors
In U.S GAO NewsMarch 4, 2021Since GAO’s 2018 report, the Department of Defense (DOD) has taken action to make its network of high-tech weapon systems less vulnerable to cyberattacks. DOD and military service officials highlighted areas of progress, including increased access to expertise, enhanced cyber testing, and additional guidance. For example, GAO found that selected acquisition programs have conducted, or planned to conduct, more cybersecurity testing during development than past acquisition programs. It is important that DOD sustain its efforts as it works to improve weapon systems cybersecurity. Contracting for cybersecurity requirements is key. DOD guidance states that these requirements should be treated like other types of system requirements and, more simply, “if it is not in the contract, do not expect to get it.” Specifically, cybersecurity requirements should be defined in acquisition program contracts, and criteria should be established for accepting or rejecting the work and for how the government will verify that requirements have been met. However, GAO found examples of program contracts omitting cybersecurity requirements, acceptance criteria, or verification processes. For example, GAO found that contracts for three of the five programs did not include any cybersecurity requirements when they were awarded. A senior DOD official said standardizing cybersecurity requirements is difficult and the department needs to better communicate cybersecurity requirements and systems engineering to the users that will decide whether or not a cybersecurity risk is acceptable. Incorporating Cybersecurity in Contracts DOD and the military services have developed a range of policy and guidance documents to improve weapon systems cybersecurity, but the guidance usually does not specifically address how acquisition programs should include cybersecurity requirements, acceptance criteria, and verification processes in contracts. Among the four military services GAO reviewed, only the Air Force has issued service-wide guidance that details how acquisition programs should define cybersecurity requirements and incorporate those requirements in contracts. The other services could benefit from a similar approach in developing their own guidance that helps ensure that DOD appropriately addresses cybersecurity requirements in contracts. DOD’s network of sophisticated, expensive weapon systems must work when needed, without being incapacitated by cyberattacks. However, GAO reported in 2018 that DOD was routinely finding cyber vulnerabilities late in its development process. A Senate report accompanying the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 included a provision for GAO to review DOD’s implementation of cybersecurity for weapon systems in development. GAO’s report addresses (1) the extent to which DOD has made progress in implementing cybersecurity for weapon systems during development, and (2) the extent to which DOD and the military services have developed guidance for incorporating weapon systems cybersecurity requirements into contracts. GAO reviewed DOD and service guidance and policies related to cybersecurity for weapon systems in development, interviewed DOD and program officials, and reviewed supporting documentation for five acquisition programs. GAO also interviewed defense contractors about their experiences with weapon systems cybersecurity. GAO is recommending that the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps provide guidance on how programs should incorporate tailored cybersecurity requirements into contracts. DOD concurred with two recommendations, and stated that the third—to the Marine Corps—should be merged with the one to the Navy. DOD’s response aligns with the intent of the recommendation. For more information, contact W. William Russell at (202) 512-4841 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Justice Department Reaches Agreement with the State of New Jersey under the National Voter Registration Act
August 5, 2021The Justice Department announced today that it has entered into a proposed consent decree to settle a voting rights lawsuit with the State of New Jersey and state officials.
- Algeria National Day
July 5, 2021